Posted by Thandie.
Eve Ensler’s ‘Man Prayer’ has been described as being “for all men” and those behind the film say: “we hope all of you will watch it and share it with every man you know”. Every time I see Man Prayer I’m reminded of the power that comes from unity between men and men, and women and men.
I’m reminded of the strength that comes from vulnerability, and truth. One certainly leads to the other.
Oh the beauty of tenderness and vulnerability! The idea that tenderness is ‘weak’ holds no water.
In fact, allowing truth to be the motivation for action creates a force stronger than any more complex plan of attack! The simplicity of truth will always be more powerful than fabrication, control, intimidation and so on. To accept ourselves as we are, and to love ourselves for that, liberates us from the insecurity that so often prompts us to compete and condemn.
But this artificial state of domination requires constant application, otherwise the natural state of balance will reveal itself. It’s been so long since any majority has enjoyed ‘balance’ that it’s impossible to imagine ourselves living that way.
But we do what we can. One Billion Rising grows every year – it’s our call to (peaceful) action, and our demand for awareness that ONE IN THREE women will suffer violence at the hands of men in her lifetime (an official UN statistic). That’s ONE BILLION women, on our planet, right now.
Eve wrote Man Prayer after meeting Gyalwang Karmapa at TED India, and was inspired by his commitment to the 1 Billion Rising movement. Eve then turned the prayer into a film with filmmaker Tony Stroebel. It’s the perfect gift to share with fathers, grandfathers, sons, husbands, boyfriends and friends. It could be the start of someone’s own desire to create balance, truth, peace, love.
“Man Prayer” – words by Eve Ensler, film by Tony Stroebel.
Eve has adapted her shattering and magnificent book ‘In The Body of the World’ into a play. It premieres at The American Repertory Theatre – watch the trailer here:
Post by Kay
Feminist or Feminine? Do they have to be mutually exclusive?
Surely not. I thought being liberated meant finding out who you are, and being allowed to be it.
I’ll get straight to that ‘it’: Bell Hooks said in her book Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics ‘“If any female feels she need anything beyond herself to legitimate and validate her existence, she is already giving away her power to be self-defining, her agency.”
So I ask, why should a woman who embraces true femininity in all its wonder (wise, instinctive, empathic- powerful stuff!) conflict in any way with the concept of feminism, which simply means, according to the Oxford Dictionary “The advocacy of women’s rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes.” So any assumption added to that is purely subjective.
So often, especially in the knee-jerking, anonymously commenting culture of online click baiting, people get lost in semantics, to and fro they go, getting all upset and trussed up in a cul de sac of assumptions – rather than realising that these words attract connotations like barnacles on rocks and they stick.
Let’s pick them off (without spoiling those nails!).
I can’t help but wish we could reevaluate what these words actually mean in modern terms. 1st: words are a device to explain things, they are not actually ‘the things’ and 2nd: words change their meaning over time (and isn’t that sick….happy and gay, everyone?).
Me? I’d always assumed that feminine meant that you were some form of loveliness, that it was also akin to being ‘a woman’, which sounds a little stronger somehow. But nonetheless, I never assumed that being ‘feminine’ in any way made me weaker, simpler, or more docile. I feel very ‘feminine’, as I’d assumed that ‘femme’ means ‘woman’, of which I am, and I feel very much ‘a woman’.
Oh to my surprise when I looked at my Mac’s dictionary meaning that said “having qualities or an appearance traditionally associated with women, especially delicacy and prettiness: the snowdrops gave a feminine touch to the table.” Oh dear-so not me, or any woman I know let alone admire. I’m a resilient, self-made only child whose friends (go sisterhood) are my family.
As for femi-nism, Germaine Greer (a very famous one) once said that “If a woman never takes off her high-heeled shoes, how will she ever know how far she could walk or how fast she could run?”. I love dresses, pencil skirts and high heels, and when I want to run Germaine, I put my Nikes on (but we needed those metaphors back in the early 70s).
Yep, I like spending whole days (and ahem, occasional weeks) in stretch fabrics and trainers but being compared to a minuscule afterthought of a flower arrangement if you’re ‘feminine’ was a tad surprising in 2016.
So with this in mind, I get why Susan Faludi wrote in her 1991 book ‘Backlash’ that “The “feminine” woman is forever static and childlike. She is like the ballerina in an old-fashioned music box, her unchanging features tiny and girlish, her voice tinkly, her body stuck on a pin, rotating in a spiral that will never grow.”
But as Virginia Woolf wrote in ‘A Room Of One’s Own’ (which I thoroughly recommend, it’s a tiny read, can fit beautifully in a ‘cigarette’ clutch) “All this pitting of sex against sex, of quality against quality; all this claiming of superiority and imputing of inferiority, belong to the private-school stage of human existence where there are ‘sides,’ and it is necessary for one side to beat another side, and of the utmost importance to walk up to a platform and receive from the hands of the Headmaster himself a highly ornamental pot.”
Feminism today has become a lot more ‘bespoke’, It is ultimately about the individual choices women make and that they are allowed to make them. A dress does not maketh the woman, her actions do.
That was my inspiration when I did the creative direction on a shot for Violet Magazine last year. It was inspired my debutantes and balls. I’d always loved the aesthetic, the beautifully crafted hair with little to no make up, a truly fabulous dream dress, soft, swan-like necks subtly sprinkled with the family heirlooms-either pearls, or diamond. The moment frozen forever under the lenses of the greats of portraiture : Cecil Beaton, Richard Avedon Irving Penn and Snowden. But the reason they looked so sweet? Debutante balls were ‘coming out’ balls, basically saying ‘she’s ready to wed’ and this is the package. So instead, I cast 6 diverse women who were whole, fully-fledged beings with or without matrimony, taking the aesthetic, and ditching the rest.
Nascent ‘UK National Treasure’ Caitlin Moran, author and unashamedly hysterical feminist has probaby a literal mile of quotes for the ‘feminist fearers’. If you haven’t yet read ‘How To Be A Woman‘ you must-especially if you like to laugh out loud on public transport. Here’s one: ““We need to reclaim the word ‘feminism’. We need the word ‘feminism’ back real bad. When statistics come in saying that only 29% of American women would describe themselves as feminist – and only 42% of British women – I used to think, What do you think feminism IS, ladies? What part of ‘liberation for women’ is not for you? Is it freedom to vote? The right not to be owned by the man you marry? The campaign for equal pay? ‘Vogue’ by Madonna? Jeans? Did all that good shit GET ON YOUR NERVES? Or were you just DRUNK AT THE TIME OF THE SURVEY?”
So now, the wonderful Zawadi models this gorgeous, modern-day ballgown by Rosie Assoulin.
We’ve found a far more affordable dress in a similar style, this 21st century lilac prom dress from asos.com, currently on sale for £35.50.